Why we must not replace Trident

Replacing Trident will commit us to having nuclear weapons for 50 more years despite these important facts:

The enormous cost

• It will cost us at least £100 billion to procure and then maintain a new nuclear
weapons system.
• The current system already costs us at least £2 billion every year just to keep
running.

The majority of people are against nuclear weapons

• Poll after poll show that the majority of British people are against nuclear
weapons. For example 63% of the British public want spending cuts to include
scrapping Trident – BPIX/Mail on Sunday poll, 2010.
• International opinion – of most governments and people worldwide – is
strongly in favour of a global ban on nuclear weapons. A nuclear weapons
convention would ban them in the same way that other weapons of mass
destruction (chemical and biological weapons) are already banned.

They make us less secure and safe

• Senior British military figures have declared that nuclear weapons are
completely useless as a deterrent to the threats and scale of violence we
currently face or are likely to face, particularly international terrorism.
• There is no threat to our security from any other nuclear weapon state
according to the Ministry of Defence (MoD). Instead it identifies the main
threats to our security as coming from terrorism, cyber-attacks and major
accidents3 (all of which nuclear weapons can never be useful against).
• Yet by having nuclear weapons the UK continues to encourage others to
develop them too. If we say we need nuclear weapons for our security then
any other country in the world can say the same, particularly those that are
more vulnerable or threatened.

The UK agreed to begin disarming in 1970

• The UK signed a legally binding international treaty many decades ago (the
nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which entered into force over 40 years ago)
agreeing us to negotiate in good faith the goal of general and complete
nuclear weapons disarmament.

It is illegal to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons

• The International Court of Justice in 1996 judged it generally illegal to use or
threaten to use nuclear weapons.

Read full briefing -12 page .pdf -from CND, :

Ken Loach

“Spending £100 billion on replacing Trident is a catastrophic folly. I’m sure I am one of many who support the those, like Action-AWE, who campaign actively and imaginatively against it”

– Ken Loach

John Hurt

".....the government has pledged to rebuild a new generation of British nuclear weapons at enormous cost and at a time when social services budgets including those for health and education are being drastically cut. Having nuclear weapons doesn't make us safer, it just brings the possibility of nuclear conflict ever closer. We need to protect this planet not put it at even more risk of destruction. We all have a voice so please use yours and join me in supporting ACTION AWE." John Hurt
For full quotes from people who've given personal messages of support to Action AWE, please click here!

Action AWE actions to date.

Window Signs!

Books for sale

WORLD IN CHAIINS

TRIDENT ON TRIAL

FASLANE 365

TRIDENT AND
INTERNATIONAL LAW