Arguments for scrapping Trident

Video:The humanitarian imperative to ban nuclear weapons

Read more »

Nuclear scare at Navy submarine base after ‘unbelievable’ failures

Nuclear scare at Navy submarine base after ‘unbelievable’ failures

Double defects left vessels without vital sources of coolant for their reactors, despite earlier warnings and incidents SAM MASTERS SUNDAY 6th OCTOBER 2013 A major nuclear incident was narrowly averted at the heart of Britain’s Royal Navy submarine fleet, The Independent on Sunday can reveal. The failure of both the primary and secondary power sources of coolant for nuclear reactors at the Devonport dockyard in Plymouth on 29 July last year followed warnings in previous years of…

Read more »

Nuclear weapons must be eradicated for all our sakes

Nuclear weapons must be eradicated for all our sakes

No nation should own nuclear arms – not Iran, not North Korea, and not their critics who take the moral high ground Desmond Tutu guardian.co.uk, Monday 4 March 2013 We cannot intimidate others into behaving well when we ourselves are misbehaving. Yet that is precisely what nations armed with nuclear weapons hope to do by censuring North Korea for its nuclear tests and sounding alarm bells over Iran’s pursuit of enriched uranium. According to their logic, a select…

Read more »

Schools & hospitals - or Trident?

Schools & hospitals – or Trident?

  Britain set to triple spending on nuclear weapons program Nargess Moballeghi, Press TV, London Thu Feb 28, 2013 A just released report has concluded that in the next decade, Britain’s Trident nuclear weapons programme will cost the country over a third of its military’s equipment budget. According to experts, the current cost is about ten percent. Paul Ingram from the British American Security Information Council, or BASIC, says that even this three-fold spike could…

Read more »

The illegality of the UK’s nuclear weapons partnership with the US

US_UK_warhead_exchange

From the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, to which the UK is a signatory - the very first article of the treaty….. NPT Article I: Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire…

Read more »

SECRETARY-GENERAL’S ADDRESS AT THE MONTEREY INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES

SECRETARY-GENERAL’S ADDRESS AT THE MONTEREY INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES

Below is the text, as prepared, of a speech given by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to the Monterey Institute of International Studies on January 18, 2013. “ADVANCING THE DISARMAMENT AND NON-PROLIFERATION AGENDA: SEEKING PEACE IN AN OVER-ARMED WORLD” President Sunder Ramaswamy, Dr. William Potter, Excellencies, Distinguished guests, Ladies and gentlemen, It is a pleasure to be at the Monterey Institute of International Studies. I thank President Sunder Ramaswamy for hosting. I also want to recognize Dr. William Potter, Director of the…

Read more »

CND - Disarming Trident - a practical guide

CND_Disarming_Trident_a_practical_guide

Read more »

Why we need to get rid of Trident

Trident costs billions and what is it for? If Trident is replaced it will cost over £100 billion to build and run. Britain doesn’t need nuclear weapons. They can’t actually be used. They don’t defend us or deter wars or terrorist attacks. If the government launched the 40-48 nuclear weapons carried on one Trident submarine it would incinerate millions of people. Even the use of one Trident warhead would violate international law and make our…

Read more »

Why we must not replace Trident

cut_trident_and_its_replacement_cnd

Replacing Trident will commit us to having nuclear weapons for 50 more years despite these important facts: The enormous cost • It will cost us at least £100 billion to procure and then maintain a new nuclear weapons system. • The current system already costs us at least £2 billion every year just to keep running. The majority of people are against nuclear weapons • Poll after poll show that the majority of British people are…

Read more »

Ken Loach

“Spending £100 billion on replacing Trident is a catastrophic folly. I’m sure I am one of many who support the those, like Action-AWE, who campaign actively and imaginatively against it”

– Ken Loach

John Hurt

".....the government has pledged to rebuild a new generation of British nuclear weapons at enormous cost and at a time when social services budgets including those for health and education are being drastically cut. Having nuclear weapons doesn't make us safer, it just brings the possibility of nuclear conflict ever closer. We need to protect this planet not put it at even more risk of destruction. We all have a voice so please use yours and join me in supporting ACTION AWE." John Hurt
For full quotes from people who've given personal messages of support to Action AWE, please click here!

Action AWE actions to date.

Window Signs!

Books for sale

WORLD IN CHAIINS

TRIDENT ON TRIAL

FASLANE 365

TRIDENT AND
INTERNATIONAL LAW